Hence, developers gain the confidence they lost from traditional development methods of merging large blocks of code.Ĭode merge tools can help teams identify conflicts. While the solutions have become more robust, DevOps and Agile methodologies help to keep changes small, which reduces the need to merge large chunks of code. When conflicts do occur that prevent the tools from merging automatically, they are reported back to the developers. The developers need to have confidence that their integration efforts are smooth and complete without any errors. Modern merge solutionsĬode merging gives developers the ability to integrate their code after changes or bug fixes. This caused inefficient management of projects. Unless an emergency arose forcing others to check out the code, only the developer assigned was permitted to manage that segment of the code. They are given a segment of the project they are responsible for. Developers are either told to limit refactoring, or they simply don’t make changes to the same code. When changes are large, managing the merge becomes a nightmare. Refactoring efforts were put on the backburner as a result.Ĭonflicts in merging occur when two or more developers are working on the same module simultaneously. Merge tools did not handle this refactoring well, and lost the confidence of developers. Unfortunately, more problems arose when the developers refactored their code. In some cases, the development teams were able to use the differences to resolve conflicts when the merge occurred. The merge functionality included with many version control programs are capable of reporting differences in code from the same module. Issues with code merging tools facing developers

Mac merge tool for git